Uniface 10 Questions | Page 2 | Uniface 10 Enterprise Edition | Forum

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

—  Results per page  —








— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
For a group of consecutive words like 'end of support' use Match phrase

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Uniface 10 Questions
08 Nov 2017
10:14 am
Avatar
Iain Sharp
Member
Forum Posts: 632
Member Since:
01 Oct 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Something to compile all the programs modified recently, or all the programs affected by the changes to the model, include files etc. 

Our copy also exports these programs to synchronise testing with development. 

08 Nov 2017
10:39 am
Avatar
sochaz
Member
Forum Posts: 167
Member Since:
01 Oct 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Deleting a component is kind of nightmare. One has to delete the component (in IDE), delete the signature (in IDE), delete the lst file (listing), delete the compiled component (file in the resources directory) and delete the compiled signature (file in the resources directory).

That’s what we do when we need to delete a component. This should be automated… just deleting a component is very tricky (since the compiled component and signature still exists, it still works in an application).

08 Nov 2017
10:44 am
Avatar
sochaz
Member
Forum Posts: 167
Member Since:
01 Oct 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

As for additional menu… one of the most used feature is our own viewer of all changes done. This works upon almost anything… I open a form, see the code and I suspect something wrong… I just open our viewer and see who and when changed what in the component. The same applies to global procedures etc…

Another use of additional menu in IDE is… on shared repository, someone locks the component – I can find out who, when and where locked it.

09 Nov 2017
10:26 am
Avatar
ulrich-merkel
Frankfurt/Germany
Member
Forum Posts: 1729
Member Since:
01 Oct 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

From the early 1990s, the real benefit of the additional menu was that you could “inject” functionality to the active IDF form.
So the additional menue gives you direct access to the “object under processing”

To boost productivity of the idf.exe, a lot of tools (in the 1990s we had commercial ones like CodeInspector)  used things like:
if $formname = “UUCONC22” ; check you edit a component
call show_forminfo(ulabel.uform)
endif

I really wonder why you think uniface can provide the same usability when dropping the Additional Menu in the first place

09 Nov 2017
7:05 pm
Avatar
Stijn Courtheyn
Member
Forum Posts: 36
Member Since:
03 May 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think that when there is no ‘additional menu’ in U10, many companies will stay with U9.
For us it is a big issue, we cannot migrate to U10 until there is some way to integrate the own created forms and hooks

This should be a top priority for Uniface I think

Software engineer / Technical Consult @ Xperthis NV (belgium)
No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/Amsterdam

Most Users Ever Online: 131

Currently Online: tayamamoto
11 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

ulrich-merkel: 1729

Iain Sharp: 632

Theo Neeskens: 347

gianni: 276

rogerw: 239

istiller: 206

lalitpct: 197

Knut: 188

Arjen van Vliet: 174

-GHAN-: 171

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 3

Members: 7422

Moderators: 0

Admins: 8

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 62

Topics: 2088

Posts: 8999

Newest Members:

Ascentdgq, Michaelnuams, Normanstank, PillzapoThuro, TravlisHop, ulascene, AndreiriT, rozavetrovdk, MihalSeisy, lessiegg4

Administrators: admin: 23, Adrian Gosbell: 290, diseli: 857, Bob Maier: 3, Nico Peereboom: 71, Michael Rabone: 4, richiet: 406, JanCees: 28